![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
YOU ARE HERE:>>REAL or FAKE>Fake classical pottery section 2>page 6
Worthwhile having a closer look at these two. ![]()
![]() The surface of the genuine one is surprisingly void of accretions.
![]()
![]() Look at the drilled hanging holes. See any significant difference?
The 'water adsorption test' is instructive here.
![]() The water adsorbtion "test" is only a suggestive sort of test and though often useful to do, must be taken alongside other methods of authentication.
The wetted pottery fabric in these two pieces also had a different smell. One smells rather like fresh clay, the other has a particularly musty smell.
For some discussion of such rudimentary tests see here>>>
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||
Home | About This Site | Privacy Statement | Gallery | Testimonials | Guarantees About Collectors' Resources pages | What's New Search | Site Map | Contact Us |